Inhibition of Induced Chemoresistance by Cotreatment with BVDU PDF Print E-mail
Article Index
Inhibition of Induced Chemoresistance by Cotreatment with BVDU
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12

  The BVDU cotreated groups showed significantly less tumor growth. The tumor areas of these groups were significantly smaller than that of controls or the groups which were treated with cytostatic drugs only (Fig. 4A, panel 2), with the differences being significant at the 5% level (t-test/Mann-Whitney test). Whereas the treatment with cytostatic drugs (DOX, cisplatin, and navelbine+ifosfamide+cisplatin) led to a defined loss of body weight, cotreatment with BVDU partly inhibited loss of body weight (Table 2). This may indicate reduced nonspecific toxicity and optimized antitumor efficiency of the BVDU cotreatment. If cytostatic treatment led to a gain of body weight, BVDU cotreatment did not additionally support this effect.

 

Table 2 BVDU reduced unspecific toxic effects in cytostatic drug-treated rats (mean of the data of six to seven rats)

Treatment Change of mean area of AH13r rat sarcomas (day 1 = 1) Day 14 Change of mean net body weight Day 14

Cytostatic treatment leading to loss of body weight    
Control (day 10) 20 +4%
9 x 4 mg/kg DOX only 4 -6%
DOX + 15 x 15 mg/kg BVDU 0.7 +4%
Control 25 +8%
4 x 1.5 mg/kg cisplatin only 17 -2%
Cisplatin + 4 x 50 mg/kg BVDU 15 +4%
Control 25 +7%
4 x 0.5 mg/kg navelbine + 4 x 50 mg/kg ifosfamide + 4 x 0.5 mg/kg cisplatin only 0.2 -5%
Navelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin + 4 x 50 mg/kg BVDU 0.2 +1%
Cytostatic treatment leading to gain in body weight    
Control (day 10) 20 +4%
15 x 180 mg/kg glufosfamide only 3 +2%
Glufosfamide + 15 x 15 mg/kg BVDU 2 +1%
Control (day 11) 32 +8%
4 x 0.5 mg/kg cisplatin only 32 +11%
Cisplatin + 15 x 15 mg/kg BVDU 24 +11%
Control (day 9) 17 +19%
1 x 46.4 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (day 9) 0.4 +7%
Cyclophosphamide + 15 x 15 mg/kg BVDU (day 9) 0.2 +9%